Rights-defending Mercedes-Benz female car owners will be held accountable.

　　Recently, Wang Jing (a pseudonym), a female car owner of Xi ‘an Mercedes-Benz, was involved in a debt dispute after defending her rights, and was even accused of "fraud" and "fleeing privately with 7 million yuan". On April 21, Wang Jing told the Beijing Youth Daily reporter that she had entrusted lawyers to communicate with those defenders who claimed that they were owed money by the competition company. "I personally didn’t cheat, I didn’t escape privately with money, I wasn’t chased by debt, I didn’t hide from debt, so please ask the relevant departments to assist my lawyer in the investigation." She said that those who say that they are fraudsters, those who flee privately with money, those who are in debt collection and those who disclose their personal information will be investigated in the end according to relevant laws and regulations.

　　As for whether the rumour maker and the person who leaked his personal information are rights-defending merchants, Wang Jing’s attorney is conducting evidence collection.

　　The rights-defending merchants said that the merchants had conducted an investigation to confirm whether the Mercedes-Benz rights-defending owners were the company operators who owed money, but there was no deliberate disclosure of their personal privacy. As for the arrears disputes involved by both parties, I hope to communicate face to face.

　　Mercedes-benz female car owner

　　Not a fraudster, not fleeing privately with money, etc.

　　Will be held accountable for the rumors.

　　From the owner of Mercedes-Benz rights protection to the object of merchant rights protection, Wang Jing said that as a party to the Mercedes-Benz rights protection incident, she didn’t want to rub hot spots and wanted to live quietly. "But why do you want to buckle a swindler’s hat to me and send all my personal information online? Who will protect my safety? ‘ 10 million fraudsters ’ 、‘ 7 million fled privately with money ’ Who are the makers of these rumors and what are the reasons behind them? Online speech is free, but it does not use online media as a spreading place for rumors, infringing on my right to privacy and reputation. In this regard, my lawyer will pursue it according to relevant laws and regulations. "

　　Wang Jing, who was involved in the arrears dispute, stressed that she is not a fraudster, has not fled privately with money, and has not been collected. "I will entrust a lawyer to collect evidence for the rumors behind these three statements. If there is definite evidence to clarify the identity of the other party, it will definitely be investigated in the end according to relevant laws and regulations."

　　Previously, Wang Jing received a malicious harassment message after she was concerned about defending her rights by sitting on the hood. She called on the public to pay attention to the Mercedes-Benz rights protection incident itself, not to pay too much attention to her individual and not to label it. "I really don’t want to be a hot spot, so I pretended not to see it before. I thought it would be gone in a few days if I had a hot spot. Who knows that it is getting worse and worse, regardless of the facts, a farce." Wang Jing said: "I have also read the comments. So far, most netizens can make fair and objective comments."

　　On April 21, Wang Jing’s boyfriend, Mr. Chen (a pseudonym), told the reporter of Beiqing Daily that he was currently cooperating with lawyers to collect and prepare evidence. "We have handed over the materials and evidence related to the enterprise to the lawyer, first separating people from the enterprise, and then taking out the disputes of the enterprise to say who is right and who is lying, and who should compensate for who’s losses."

　　Attorney

　　Preserving the evidence that the client was infringed.

　　Or will sue.

　　Zhou Zhaocheng, Wang Jing’s attorney, said that the poor management of Wang Jing’s company led to a contract dispute, which was a civil dispute rather than a criminal offence, which was confirmed by Shanghai Xuhui police. "As an attorney, we also urge the company where Wang Jing works to show sincerity as soon as possible and communicate with the other party to the civil contract dispute, hoping that both parties can solve the dispute according to law within the framework of law."

　　Regarding Wang Jing’s personal privacy disclosure and reputation dispute, Zhou Zhaocheng said that at present, Wang Jing’s personal identity information and personal portrait were leaked at will on the Internet, and false statements such as "fraudsters" and "running away with money" were spread at will. In individual media, there are a lot of contents that seriously infringe on Wang Jing’s rights, with high click volume, wide spread and very bad influence. "The above content not only deliberately slanders and abuses portraits, but also uses many insulting words to vilify and belittle the client. The dissemination, reprinting and disseminator of these contents have infringed on Wang Jing’s right to reputation and portrait, and even some of them have been suspected of criminal offences. As attorneys, we are organizing a team of lawyers to conduct research on Internet-related ‘ Evidence of infringement and illegality ’ Security, for individual malicious ‘ The reporter ’ ‘ Revealer ’ ‘ Communicator ’ It is not excluded to report the case to the public security organ or file an infringement lawsuit with the people’s court on behalf of the client. "

　　Lawyer Zhou Zhaocheng also said that "whistleblowers" and "whistleblowers" should not take advantage of the enthusiasm of their client "Xi ‘an Mercedes-Benz female car owners to defend their rights" to maliciously speculate, reveal personal privacy on the Internet, carry out personal attacks, openly spread their client’s personal identity card information, and call the original ordinary civil dispute a "criminal offence".

　　Rights-defending merchants

　　There is no deliberate disclosure of personal privacy.

　　Deny any connection with Mercedes-Benz.

　　Regarding the fact that Wang Jing entrusted a lawyer to investigate the disclosure of personal privacy, Mr. Gao, an activist merchant, told the reporter of Beiqing Daily that it is a good thing for Wang Jing to ask a lawyer to speak out. First, it proves that this matter (arrears) does exist, and second, merchants can confront her face to face.

　　Mr. Gao introduced that he didn’t know who leaked Wang Jing’s personal information, and he didn’t know who was the first "People’s Mentor 1688" who posted the news. As early as before Wang Jing’s Mercedes-Benz rights protection incident, the merchants and suppliers who were owed money by the competition company had begun to defend their rights.

　　For the netizen who posted that "the female master of Mercedes-Benz 4S shop was actually a fugitive of 7 million fraud cases", the reporter of Beiqing Daily tried to contact by private letter, and has not received a reply yet, and his account has not been found at present.

　　After the Mercedes-Benz incident broke out, some merchants transferred the video to the rights protection group, thinking that this rights protection owner was Wang Jing, the head of the competing company who owed money at the beginning.

　　Mr. Gao introduced that some merchants went to Xi ‘an Lizhixing to compare Wang Jing’s signature and investigate whether the two were the same person. In the process, it was not excluded that some merchants had left a message about Wang Jing’s real name on the related net post. "I have never found anyone, but suddenly appeared. Do you think everyone is excited?"

　　Mr. Gao believes that because Wang Jing has never appeared, when the property sued Jingji Company on March 19, Wang Jing and her boyfriend did not appear in court. The merchants conducted the investigation in order to confirm Wang Jing’s true identity, and there was no deliberate disclosure of her personal privacy. "Moreover, about her company and court sessions, it was all public information on the Internet, and the photos of her past were transmitted online. The original situation at the university was not sent by us, because we did not.

　　Some netizens questioned that the rights-defending merchants were asked by Mercedes-Benz public relations. Mr. Gao said that it was only because of the coincidence of time, there was no deliberate rumor by Mercedes-Benz public relations, and there was no need to rub hot spots.

　　Text/reporter Li Tao Dai Youqing Zhang Yue Meng Li Zhuoya

　　Coordinator/Jiang Shuo